C&R · III · 160
Scagel combination rifle/pistol (Winchester 1904A)
Section III: removed from the NFA, curio or relic under the GCA
Official wording
ATF P 5300.11 · APRIL 2025 EDITION · SECTION III · VERBATIM · PDF P. 45 ↗
William W. Scagel combination rifle/pistol, manufactured from a Winchester, Model 1904A, cal. .22LR, no serial number, with factory-original, 24 ½ inch barrel.
What this entry requires
- ATF REQUIRESOriginal as the ATF wording requires: “with factory-original”
- ATF REQUIRESConfigured as the ATF wording states: “24 ½ inch barrel”
- ATF REQUIRESYour firearm has no serial number, as the ATF wording states
- INFOATF states no date; production was about 1927–1963.
Editorial facts · Our research
- Country
United StatesBasis: no citation - Manufacturer
- William W. Scagel, from a Winchester Model 1904ABasis: the ATF wording
- Type
- OtherBasis: the ATF wording
- Action
- BoltBasis: no citation
- Caliber
- .22 LRBasis: the ATF wording
- Made
- No S/N · c. 1927–1963production; ATF states no dateBasis: outside reference ¹
- Service
- Commercial
Source
- Official wording
- ATF P 5300.11, April 2025 edition · Section III · PDF p. 45 ↗ · ATF original ↗
- Entries
- 1 line
- Verbatim check
- Checked against the PDF text before every release
- Editorial facts
- Confidence: Medium · Last revised 17 October 2026 (Data-trust review) · How we rate confidence
- References
- 1. Wikipedia, “William Scagel” ↗, years: William W. Scagel, 1873–1963
- 2. Wikipedia, “List of Winchester models” ↗, general: Model 1904: bolt-action single-shot .22 rifle
- Fact tags
- ATF the ATF wording states it.
- REF ¹ an outside reference supports it; the number points to the list of references.
- ESTIMATE an approximate or indirect reading, for example the production range of the base model.
- NO CITATION we haven’t attached a reference for this fact; it’s our editorial reading, not ATF’s.
- Source checked
- 20 October 2026: ATF’s page still lists the April 2025 edition
- Corrections
- 1 change · see below
Correction history
- Data-trust reviewEditorial confidence: Low → Medium. Re-rated after supporting references were added or re-checked.
Historical context
NO VERIFIED IMAGE AVAILABLEWe show only freely licensed images verified to depict this model. None has been found yet.